Commentary

3/2/21 Current Signals xHL/o3>c1

xHL did come to pass yesterday. The cQuatz looks like c1, with a small negative return probable from CO.

The quatz logic has “worked” since about the beginning of 2020. The cQuatz looks “better”. The analysis seems to show that equities, in general, follow SPY CO but then sort of do their own thing OC. Note that c0 and c1 returns and win rates are similar – CO is negative for both, almost by definition. c2 and c3 CO is positive for the same reason.

That suggests that binary decisions on buying CO have been working well if OC is negative and vice versa. The oQuatz is less clear.

The technical issue is exploiting these examples of high dimensional clustering before they inevitably start working differently.

I’m debating with myself whether to take the rest of the day off.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s